Health

New Zealand's health system is judged by how much money goes in rather than what comes out, and it shows. Waiting lists lengthen, general practice cannot recruit fast enough to replace the doctors retiring from it and each reorganisation of the bureaucracy is followed in due course by another.

Part of the trouble is the financial horizon. Health budgets are set a year at a time, which makes prevention, early diagnosis and rehabilitation look like costs rather than investments. ACC, whatever its faults, has to live with the long-run consequences of its own decisions, and it behaves differently as a result.

The Initiative argues for stronger primary care, because it is the cheapest place to treat most illness and the most expensive place to run short of staff. Funding models should reward keeping people well rather than counting appointments. Medicines and clinicians already approved by comparable countries should not wait years for a second opinion here. And the data should be good enough to show whether any of it is working.

A system that cannot measure its results cannot improve them.

NZ by comparison cover with outline

Featured Publication

Publications

Opinion & Media

Stay in the loop: Subscribe to updates