Environment

Prosperity and environmental quality are not opposites. Countries that grow richer generally clean up, and countries that stagnate generally do not.

What matters is how environmental goals are pursued. Where the objective is clear and property rights are well defined, prices and tradeable rights do the work more cheaply than rules, and they keep doing it without any official having to guess who should reduce what and by how much. Where the rights are vague, everybody litigates instead.

The Initiative applies that thinking across the environment. Emissions are capped and traded, so additional climate policies sitting under the cap add cost without cutting net emissions. Fisheries have shown that secure, tradeable quota can sustain a resource, and the same logic could settle the long-running argument between commercial and recreational fishers. Freshwater would be better served by tradeable catchment allocations than by uniform rules applied to unequal land. A planning system should name the effects that matter rather than require permission for everything. And a primary sector expected to earn the country's living needs regulators willing to approve proven technology and a biosecurity system funded before the incursion rather than after it.

New Zealanders can have a country that is both pristine and prosperous. The environment is too valuable to protect wastefully. Every dollar spent on an expensive way of securing one environmental gain is another gain the country never gets.

NZ by comparison cover with outline

Featured Publication

Publications

Opinion & Media

Stay in the loop: Subscribe to updates